In psychology there is a very popular theory of motivation. Theory X and Theory Y, one of the very famous theory of motivation by McGregor. Theory X explains the need for supervision, rewards and penalties whereas theory Y emphasises on internal motivation to do any task. There is no doubt that if any being is driven by internal motivating factors then there is none of any rewards or penalties or supervisions. But the real question is " Can imposing penalties actually lead to behavioural changes in breaking the rules?"
Lets sit back and think about the human nature when he sees threat in something. The first reaction can be a panic, a thwart, a glitch to take desired action, however as the feeling syncs in fear slowly subsides down. People in the meantime learn to take either the preventive actions or shortcuts to avoid the loop. Breaking any rule gives a kick to prove the courageous and outgoing nature. Internet is full of quotes which says" Break the rules and make your own". somewhere down the line people have associated breaking rules with their own liberation. this is where the prima context goes for a toss.
Liberation or courageousness is not associated with the rule breakers. People need to understand that there is a ecosystem for everything to co-exist. If traffic rules will not be followed then the consequences can be disastrous. As per statistics, the number of vehicles have grown at an alarming rate on Indian roads. the average speed in Some cities is as low as 17 kmph. The most astonishing figures come from tier-2 cities of India. the five most dangerous cities which recorded the highest fatalities in road accidents are: Jamshedpur, Asansol, Amritsar, Agra and Dhanbad. Cities with the highest number of accidental deaths includes Delhi, Chennai, Jaipur, Kanpur and Lucknow. At this point I would like to raise a question worth a thought: It is the same Indians in other countries (developed) where they don't break the law. Is it the fear of the punishment or the ecosystem which makes them conscious while they are on road. I hope the latter one works more in this case as their breaking rules is not synonymous to liberation. Everyone is liberated enough for the enlightenment that traffic rules are meant for their own safety and they should not break it.
One of the root cause of accidents includes more usage of personal vehicles as compared to public transport. in developed nations people use more of public transport rather than personal but in India the situation is the reverse. Just like every person holds more than one mobile similarly every household owns more than one vehicle. Poor infrastructure has led people to switch to their own convenience. There is no doubt that population density in our country is too high being the second most populous nation therefore the measures to confront personal vehicle cannot be just effective enough.
Number of flyovers and highways do not ensure the minimal road casualties. Then where lies the solution to this grave problem? People should understand that rules are not some hindrance to their freedom but its a way to ensure their safety on roads. there should be more and more examples to reinforce the idea of safety by the government. This fine hike should not be seen as the shackles. Just like "Swatchch Bharat Abhiyaan", if cities gets awarded because of the cleaner roads similar concept can be applied to minimal road casualties, there should be an applaud for the residents of the state/district/state. The participation of people in small communities to work together and discuss the reason to eradicate the road mishap can be very effective. This will lead to minimal involvement of police to reinforce the rules. It is very well evident that if any problem is tackled by government and common people of the nation that problem just disappears in a matter of time. The consciousness to acknowledge the adversities of the current behaviour needs to rise. This problem can be solved by proper feed back mechanism and not just by imposing stricter rules. It is just a matter of perspective. If a person is breaking signal because he is in a hurry to reach to some place or someone is drunk and driving or not wearing seat belts or helmets, all these reasons can be taken care of if people work together. It is the nature of any living creature if boundaries are created they will definitely tend to break those boundaries but if boundaries are expanded to raise human consciousness these problems might prove to be timid. Positive reinforcement (rather than negative) always works better in case of theory X and if things can be brought line with theory Y then no problem will actually exist.
